Introduction
The intersection of electoral politics, demographic anxiety, and digital communication has transformed the democratic landscape of the Indian subcontinent, with the northeastern state of Assam serving as one of the most volatile crucibles for these converging forces. As the world's largest democracy navigates successive electoral cycles, the strategic deployment of hate speech has evolved from a fringe rhetorical device into a central, institutionalized mechanism for voter mobilization and societal polarization.1 In Assam, a state characterized by a complex historical tapestry of indigenous tribes, historical migrants, and religious minorities, the discourse surrounding elections has undergone a profound and highly orchestrated metamorphosis. Over the past decade, the political narrative has systematically shifted from regional ethno-linguistic protectionism toward a virulent strain of religious majoritarianism, primarily targeting the state's Bengali-origin Muslim population.3
Recent civil society reports, international monitors, and human rights tribunals have documented an alarming trajectory in the volume, severity, and institutional backing of hate speech across India. This trajectory is deeply intertwined with the ideological ambitions of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the broader Hindu nationalist movement. National data reveals that hate speech incidents targeting religious minorities surged from 668 in 2023 to 1,165 in 2024, representing a staggering 74.4% increase.2 Within this national framework, Assam occupies a unique and highly precarious position. The state's historical anxieties regarding cross-border immigration from neighboring Bangladesh have been repurposed and weaponized by political elites to construct a perpetual existential threat. This narrative portrays Bengali-origin Muslims—often derogatorily referred to as "Miyas," "infiltrators," or "encroachers"—as a demographic, environmental, and cultural menace to the indigenous Assamese and the broader Hindu identity.5
The deployment of hate speech in this context is not merely an unfortunate byproduct of heated political campaigns; rather, it constitutes the fundamental architecture of the electoral strategy.1 By synthesizing data from civil society monitoring groups, historical analyses, legal frameworks, and digital rights assessments, this exhaustive report systematically deconstructs the anatomy of electoral hate speech in Assam. The analysis traces the historical antecedents of the state's demographic anxieties, examines the legislative gerrymandering that redefined citizenship, and evaluates the catalytic role of social media platforms and artificial intelligence in the hyper-amplification of dangerous speech. Furthermore, the report investigates the profound real-world consequences of this rhetoric—including state-sponsored violence, mass evictions, and democratic backsliding—while critically assessing the efficacy of institutional responses from the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the judiciary, alongside the emergence of grassroots civil society resistance.
Historical Antecedents: Migration, Demographics, and the Genesis of the "Other"
To accurately comprehend the contemporary weaponization of hate speech in Assam, it is imperative to contextualize the state's long-standing, deeply entrenched demographic anxieties. The historical roots of the "Muslim question" in Assam extend far beyond the singular narrative of colonial-era peasant migration; they are inextricably linked to the complex cartographic evolution of the region under British rule. The demographic contours of modern Assam began taking shape following the Treaty of Yandabo in 1826, which brought the Ahom kingdom under the British Empire. Crucially, even prior to this annexation, western and southern territories—specifically Greater Goalpara and the Sylhet region—were already under British administration and home to deep-rooted Bengali-speaking populations. When the colonial government carved out Assam as a separate Chief Commissioner's Province in 1874, it administratively tethered these populous, Bengali-majority districts to the Assamese-speaking Brahmaputra Valley to ensure the new province's economic viability. It was upon this already intricate, shifting ethno-linguistic mosaic that the British later superimposed policies encouraging the migration of landless East Bengali peasants to Assam’s fertile riverine plains to boost agricultural revenue and support the tea industry. Consequently, the enduring friction between the Assamese and Bengali-speaking communities is the product of deliberate administrative boundary-drawing and the merging of distinct geographies, compounded by subsequent economic migrations.
The historical culmination of these tensions was the Assam Movement, also known as the Anti-Foreigners Agitation, which spanned from 1979 to 1985.9 Led by the All Assam Students Union (AASU) and the All Assam Gana Sangram Parishad (AAGSP), this mass uprising demanded the immediate detection, disenfranchisement, and deportation of "illegal aliens" who had allegedly encroached upon the state's electoral rolls.9 The movement defined a six-year period of sustained civil disobedience, political instability, and catastrophic ethnic violence, most notably the Nellie massacre of 1983, wherein thousands of Bengali Muslims were slaughtered in a highly organized pogrom.8
The agitation officially concluded with the signing of the Assam Accord in 1985 under the Rajiv Gandhi administration. The Accord established midnight of March 24, 1971—the eve of the Bangladesh Liberation War—as the absolute cutoff date for defining legal citizenship in the state.8 Anyone entering India from Bangladesh after this date was officially labeled an "illegal immigrant" subject to deportation. For decades following the Accord, the political fault lines in Assam remained primarily ethno-linguistic, pitting the indigenous Assamese against Bengali-speaking migrants, irrespective of the latter's religious affiliation (Hindu or Muslim). The fear of the "Bangladeshi" was a unifying political rallying cry that brought together disparate, ideologically opposed ethnic factions under the banner of regional sub-nationalism.3
However, the political landscape underwent a seismic shift with the ascent of the BJP to state power in 2016. The political discourse was meticulously re-engineered to map the existing insider-outsider binary directly onto a Hindu-Muslim axis.3 The BJP's electoral promise to protect indigenous rights through the slogan of Jati-Mati-Bheti (identity, land, and base) gradually transitioned from a defense of Assamese culture into a defense of Hindu civilizational supremacy.3 The xenophobia rooted in the Assam Movement was thus surgically extracted from its ethno-linguistic context and repurposed as a tool for religious polarization, transforming the "Bangladeshi immigrant" into the purely religious category of the "Miya Muslim".3
The Legislative Crucible: NRC, CAA, and the Redefinition of Citizenship
The transition from ethno-nationalism to religious majoritarianism in Assam's political rhetoric was not achieved through speech alone; it was structurally cemented through highly controversial legislative and bureaucratic frameworks. The primary instruments of this transformation were the National Register of Citizens (NRC) and the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) of 2019.3
The NRC update in Assam, a bureaucratic exercise ostensibly aimed at separating genuine citizens from undocumented immigrants based on legacy data dating back to 1951, culminated in the publication of a final list in August 2019. The process was fraught with immense human suffering, as millions of impoverished, semi-literate individuals were forced to navigate a labyrinthine legal system to prove their citizenship.13 The final NRC excluded approximately 1.9 million individuals, effectively rendering them stateless. However, the demographic composition of the excluded population posed a significant political dilemma for the ruling BJP: a substantial portion of those left off the list were Bengali Hindus, a core constituency for the party.3
To circumvent the political fallout of disenfranchising its own voter base, the central government pushed through the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) in December 2019. The CAA provided an expedited pathway to Indian citizenship for religious minorities—specifically Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians—fleeing persecution from neighboring Muslim-majority countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan) who had entered India before December 31, 2014.11 Crucially, the legislation explicitly excluded Muslims from this amnesty provision.12
In the context of Assam, the CAA effectively operated as a legislative safeguard for migrant Hindus excluded by the NRC, while simultaneously cementing the status of Bengali-origin Muslims as the sole, irredeemable "illegal infiltrators".3 This dual mechanism fundamentally altered the constitutional definition of citizenship in India, tying it explicitly to religious identity and violating the secular principles enshrined in the Constitution.12 The legislative maneuvering provided absolute validation to the Hindu nationalist narrative. It allowed political leaders to openly distinguish between "indigenous" (Khilonjia) Muslims, whom they claimed to tolerate, and Bengali-origin "Miya" Muslims, who were systematically stripped of their civic legitimacy and exposed to relentless rhetorical and physical attacks.3
The Anatomy of Electoral Hate Speech: Lexicon, Tropes, and Dehumanization
The contemporary electoral strategy in Assam relies heavily on the meticulous construction and amplification of fear. The rhetoric deployed during the 2021 state assembly elections, the 2024 general elections, and the ongoing preparations for the 2026 state elections demonstrates a highly orchestrated campaign to polarize the electorate by demonizing the Bengali-origin Muslim community.3 This hate speech operates through a specific, hyper-localized lexicon designed to strip the targeted population of their humanity, agency, and civic rights.
The Weaponization of the "Miya" Identity
The term "Miya," historically utilized as a respectful Urdu term of address for a gentleman, has been violently reclaimed and repurposed in Assam's political lexicon as a highly pejorative slur. It is deployed exclusively to denote Bengali-origin Muslims, inextricably linking their identity to the specter of the "illegal Bangladeshi encroacher".5 During election campaigns, the political participation of this demographic is routinely portrayed as an existential threat. Political rhetoric frequently insists that the state is under siege by "Miyas," creating a narrative wherein the very presence of this community is an act of demographic aggression.6
For instance, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has explicitly stated in public addresses that the demographic growth of the Muslim population—which constitutes roughly 36% of the state—represents an influx of "infiltrators" who will eventually be "kicked out".7 He has publicly alleged that Bengali-origin Muslims are conspiring to "take over" upper Assam, warning native residents against allowing this demographic shift.16 The rhetoric extends to the cultural sphere as well. When proposals were made to establish a museum celebrating the culture of riverine char-dwellers, BJP legislators like Shiladitya Dev launched vitriolic attacks, demanding the museum be "set on fire" and declaring that "Miya culture cannot be the culture of Assam," further asserting that the community's identity markers, such as the Lungi and Topi, are foreign impositions.17
Biological Determinism and Entomological Metaphors
The dehumanization of the minority community frequently descends into biological determinism and entomological metaphors, a hallmark of genocidal rhetoric globally. High-ranking political figures have repeatedly utilized parasitic metaphors to describe the Bengali-origin Muslim demographic. During multiple election rallies, Union Home Minister Amit Shah notoriously referred to Bangladeshi migrants as "termites" that are eating into the nation's resources and security, promising a nationwide NRC to eradicate them.18
This linguistic framing serves a critical psychological function: by categorizing a human population as an infestation, an ecological hazard, or a disease, the state implicitly justifies extreme, extralegal measures of eradication, exclusion, and violence.18 Official state discourse and regional media frequently equate Bengali Muslim char-dwellers with "rats," "crows," and "vultures," projecting them as environmental waste producers who systematically destroy natural habitats, national parks, and government grazing reserves.21 The concept of "environmental racism" is thus deeply embedded in the electoral hate speech of Assam, utilizing the pretext of ecological conservation to justify violent eviction drives against marginalized Muslim farmers.21
The Manufacture of Localized "Jihads"
To sustain the momentum of polarization and maintain the electorate in a state of perpetual anxiety, political elites in Assam have cultivated a constantly evolving, highly localized taxonomy of conspiracy theories. By appending the suffix "jihad" to ordinary socio-economic activities, the state apparatus transforms mundane daily life into acts of organized warfare against the Hindu majority.16
While the national Hindu right-wing relies heavily on the trope of "Love Jihad" (the baseless conspiracy that Muslim men feign love to convert Hindu women) and "Vote Jihad" (the coordinated voting by minorities to defeat majoritarian candidates) 23, the discourse in Assam has been creatively expanded. Chief Minister Sarma has routinely accused the minority community of waging "Land Jihad" (allegations of Muslims systematically and illegally occupying indigenous land), "Fertilizer Jihad" (claims that Muslim farmers deliberately use excessive chemical fertilizers to poison Hindu consumers), and "Flood Jihad" (bizarre accusations that Muslims deliberately caused catastrophic urban flooding in Guwahati by intentionally altering drainage systems).16
Furthermore, the state leadership has publicly blamed the "Miya" community for fluctuating macroeconomic indicators, such as the rise in the price of vegetables in urban centers, suggesting a coordinated economic attack against the Assamese people.25 In public speeches, Sarma has also claimed that newly arrived Muslims have "weaponized" the consumption of beef and the Islamic call to prayer as deliberate tactics to drive out local Hindus and pollute sacred spaces.5 This relentless barrage of conspiracy theories ensures that the majority community views the minority not as fellow citizens, but as active combatants in an undeclared civilizational war.3
The Statistical Topography of Hate: Empirical Data and Trends
The escalation of hate speech in India, and specifically in Assam, is not merely anecdotal; it is substantiated by robust empirical data compiled by independent civil society organizations and research laboratories. An analysis of the data reveals a clear correlation between the intensity of hate speech and the occurrence of significant electoral events, underscoring its utility as a primary campaign strategy.
According to a comprehensive 2024 report by the Center for the Study of Organized Hate (CSOH) and the India Hate Lab (IHL), the number of verified in-person hate speech events in India surged from 668 in 2023 to 1,165 in 2024.2 This represents a staggering 74.4% increase year-over-year.2 The targeting is highly asymmetrical: of the 1,165 events recorded in 2024, an overwhelming 1,147 (98.5%) explicitly targeted religious minorities, primarily Muslims (1,050 events explicitly) and Christians.29
The nature of the speeches has also grown increasingly violent. The concept of "dangerous speech"—defined academically and legally as speech that significantly increases the risk that its audience will condone or participate in violence against members of another group—saw a dramatic rise.2 In 2024, 274 hate speeches (23.5%) openly called for the seizure, removal, or destruction of places of worship owned by minorities; 123 speeches (10.6%) included explicit calls to arms, advocating for Hindus to procure weapons under the guise of "protection"; and 111 speeches (9.5%) demanded the total social and economic boycott of minority communities.2 Furthermore, 182 speeches (15.6%) specifically promoted the "Bangladeshi infiltrator" bogeyman, a narrative highly concentrated in the political discourse of Assam and neighboring eastern states.2
The data also reveals a stark political alignment regarding the origin of these speeches. In 2023, 75% of all hate speech events took place in states or union territories ruled by the BJP.30 During the 2024 General Election period alone (March 16 to May 29, 2024), the South Asia Justice Campaign documented 380 "top and intermediate-level" hate speeches. Shockingly, 287 of these speeches (76%) were delivered by senior BJP leaders, representing a 600% increase compared to the 2019 general election period.7 The top offenders included the Prime Minister (61 speeches), the Union Home Minister (43 speeches), and the Chief Minister of Assam, Himanta Biswa Sarma, who delivered at least 22 highly inciteful speeches.7 This data unequivocally demonstrates that hate speech is not an aberration committed by fringe vigilantes, but a highly coordinated, top-down electoral methodology.
The Digital Amplification Engine: Social Media and Vernacular Blind Spots
The unparalleled efficacy and reach of electoral hate speech in Assam are inextricably linked to the region's rapid digitalization and the strategic manipulation of social media platforms. Over the past decade, India has transitioned into a complex hybrid media system, where traditional broadcasting networks work in tandem with online platforms like Facebook, YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), and WhatsApp to create hermetically sealed echo chambers of majoritarian outrage.32 While traditional regional television channels in Assam, such as News Live and DY365, have frequently been criticized for sensationalizing conflict and aligning with powerful political interests 35, it is the unregulated expanse of social media that has truly democratized the distribution of hate.
Algorithmic Bias and Live-Streaming Virality
Social media platforms are fundamentally designed to prioritize engagement, and content that elicits high-arousal emotions such as anger, fear, and tribalistic indignation naturally receives preferential algorithmic amplification.33 Political parties have weaponized this architecture. Of the 1,165 verified hate speech events in India in 2024, an overwhelming 995 (85.4%) were first shared or live-streamed on social media platforms.2 Facebook emerged as the primary vector, accounting for 495 events, while 211 events were exclusively shared on YouTube.29
The ruling establishment extensively utilizes Facebook Live and YouTube Live to broadcast election campaign speeches, allowing anti-Muslim hate to bypass traditional media fact-checking and reach millions of smartphones instantaneously.29 In 2024, 266 anti-minority hate speeches delivered by senior political leaders were simultaneously live-streamed across official party accounts boasting millions of followers.29 Furthermore, platforms like YouTube have facilitated the rise of "Hindutva Pop"—a genre of far-right, highly provocative music videos that explicitly promote anti-Muslim conspiracy theories and glorify violence, serving as a potent tool for the digital radicalization of the youth.29
The Failure of Vernacular Content Moderation
Despite possessing comprehensive community standards prohibiting hate speech and incitement to violence, global social media conglomerates have proven to be catastrophically inept at moderating content in regional Indian languages. A pivotal investigative report by the global advocacy group Avaaz highlighted that hate speech targeted at Bengali Muslims in Assam spread almost unabated on Facebook during the highly volatile period of the NRC publication, when nearly two million people faced potential statelessness.20
The Avaaz report exposed a fundamental and lethal flaw in the platforms' reliance on Artificial Intelligence for content moderation: AI models lack the nuanced linguistic training, cultural context, and syntax recognition required to detect hate speech in Assamese and its local dialects.20 When human rights defenders manually flagged explicit posts calling Bengali Muslims "parasites," "rats," and "rapists," and demanding their extermination, Facebook's automated systems routinely dismissed the reports, responding with automated messages stating that the content did not breach community standards.20
This "vernacular blind spot" grants impunity to digital hatemongers. The CSOH report noted that out of 259 recorded instances of dangerous speech on social media in 2024, Facebook had removed only 3 videos as of February 2025; the remaining 98.4% of the violative content remained active and accessible, continuing to radicalize the populace.2 When platforms fail to deploy human moderators fluent in regional languages like Assamese, they effectively become complicit in the architecture of polarization, prioritizing market expansion over user safety and democratic integrity.20
The Frontier of Electoral Manipulation: Generative AI and Weaponized Disinformation
The most alarming development in the lead-up to recent and upcoming elections in Assam has been the highly sophisticated integration of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) to manufacture bespoke disinformation and synthetic realities. While traditional hate speech relies on rhetorical persuasion, AI-weaponized disinformation creates a hyper-realistic, visceral simulation of the majority community's worst fears, fundamentally altering the epistemology of the public sphere.
A comprehensive preliminary monitoring report by the Diaspora in Action for Human Rights and Democracy (DAHRD) meticulously documented the normalization of AI-generated propaganda in Assam's electoral campaigns.38 Conducting an open-source analysis of 57 social media accounts between November 2023 and March 2024, the DAHRD identified 158 confirmed AI-generated posts specifically targeting Bengali-speaking Muslim communities. These posts, which garnered over 1.38 million views, were not produced by fringe actors but were distributed through official political channels, including the verified accounts of state cabinet ministers.38
The watershed moment in this technological escalation was the release of an AI-generated deepfake video by the Assam BJP's official X (formerly Twitter) handle, ominously titled "Assam Without BJP".39 The video abandoned traditional textual stereotyping in favor of a cinematic, dystopian hallucination. It depicted a fabricated future where Muslims have achieved total demographic dominance (falsely claiming a "90% Muslim population") and have culturally erased the Assamese identity.39 The highly produced deepfake imagery showed Muslims violently seizing indigenous land, operating public beef stalls in sacred spaces, and transforming ancient Assamese landmarks into Islamic sites.39 To politically weaponize this manufactured dystopia, the video featured deepfakes of prominent opposition leaders, including Gaurav Gogoi and Rahul Gandhi, standing alongside the Pakistani flag, explicitly insinuating an unholy, anti-national alliance designed to orchestrate the downfall of the Hindu population.38
This deployment of AI represents a profound paradigm shift in electoral manipulation. By visually manifesting the abstract concept of demographic invasion, synthetic media short-circuits rational political debate and critical thinking.1 The psychological impact of witnessing one's homeland visually desecrated in high-definition video directly stimulates tribalistic survival instincts, ensuring that voting behavior is driven entirely by communal panic and the absolute necessity of retaining the current regime for physical safety.1
Administrative Coercion: State Violence, Evictions, and Disenfranchisement
The unrelenting barrage of electoral hate speech in Assam is not merely a crisis of public discourse; it is the primary catalyst for tangible, devastating socio-political violence and systemic disenfranchisement. When state executives and constitutional authorities employ eliminationist rhetoric, the administrative apparatus invariably translates these dog whistles into aggressive state policy. The linguistic dehumanization of the minority seamlessly transitions into physical dispossession.24
The Weaponization of Land and the Garukhuti Evictions
The most direct and brutal manifestation of hate speech translating into state violence is witnessed in the targeted eviction drives against Bengali-origin Muslim farming communities. The political framing of these communities as "illegal encroachers" waging "Land Jihad" provides the necessary ideological scaffolding for mass demolitions without due process.5
The Garukhuti Agriculture Project in the Darrang district serves as a harrowing case study of this dynamic. Promoted politically as a visionary initiative to reclaim agricultural land for "indigenous" youth, the state government launched a massive, militarized eviction drive in September 2021 against Muslim farmers who had cultivated the riverine areas for decades.42 The evictions were characterized by extreme, disproportionate state violence, culminating in police opening fire on protesting civilians, resulting in the fatal shootings of Moinul Haque and Shaikh Farid.42 Fact-finding reports by civil rights groups, such as the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR), highlighted that the rhetoric justifying these brutal evictions was heavily steeped in the Islamophobic narratives normalized during the preceding election campaigns.42 Following the violence, groups mobilized by local ethno-nationalist organizations demanded that the evicted Muslims be denied shelter or resettlement in any surrounding areas, utilizing the slur "Miya" to justify their total exclusion and destitution.5
Electoral Purges and the Specter of Statelessness
Concurrently, the rhetoric of the "infiltrator" operates in tandem with bureaucratic harassment aimed at political disenfranchisement. The ongoing Special Revision (SR) of electoral rolls in Assam has been deeply controversial due to the mass filing of objections under Form-7.43 Unlike routine revisions, civil society groups and opposition parties have alleged that the SR mechanism is being systematically misused by workers affiliated with the ruling party to target the citizenship status of Bengali-speaking Muslims.43
This targeted administrative purge led to the deletion of over 2.43 lakh so-called "doubtful voters" (D-voters) from the final electoral rolls published in early 2026.44 Millions of Bengali Muslims live under the constant terror that a minor spelling mismatch or a clerical error in their birthdate will not only end their voting rights but result in their classification as "foreigners," leading to their internment in the massive detention centers constructed across the state.43
The Panel of Independent International Experts (PIIE) has issued stark warnings regarding these developments. The panel concluded that the cumulative, institutionalized pattern of hate speech by the Chief Minister and state actors, combined with large-scale expulsions and demolitions, reflects the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights. The PIIE cautioned that such actions may amount to crimes against humanity, specifically persecution and forcible transfer, signaling that the rhetoric is actively preparing the ground for ethnic cleansing.46
Institutional Paralysis: The Election Commission and the Judiciary
The unfettered proliferation of hate speech during Assam's electoral cycles exposes a profound crisis of institutional accountability. Despite possessing a robust theoretical framework of constitutional morality and comprehensive penal codes designed to prevent the incitement of communal enmity, the enforcement apparatus remains paralyzed, highly selective, or willfully complicit.
The Inefficacy of the Election Commission of India (ECI)
The Election Commission of India (ECI) is constitutionally mandated under Article 324 to conduct free and fair elections. This mandate is operationalized through the Model Code of Conduct (MCC), which explicitly prohibits political parties and candidates from engaging in any activity that aggravates existing differences, creates mutual hatred, or appeals to caste or communal feelings to secure votes.47 Furthermore, Section 123(3) and Section 125 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, criminalize the promotion of enmity between classes of citizens on the grounds of religion.40
However, the ECI's response to top-tier political leadership engaging in egregious hate speech has been overwhelmingly characterized by profound inaction or superficial censure. While the Commission has occasionally demonstrated the capacity to act—such as the 72-hour campaign ban imposed on certain politicians in 2019 50, or the show-cause notice served to Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma in October 2023 for communally charged statements in Chhattisgarh 51—these interventions are wildly inconsistent and fail to act as a systemic deterrent.
During the 2024 general elections and subsequent state campaigns, opposition blocs and civil society organizations like Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) filed numerous detailed complaints against the Assam Chief Minister for delivering highly inflammatory speeches in states like Jharkhand, where he repeatedly branded Muslims as "infiltrators" threatening local demography.27 Despite these detailed submissions highlighting clear violations of the MCC and the RPA, the ECI has largely abstained from imposing significant penalties, public censures, or campaign bans on executive heads.27 The failure of the ECI to decisively penalize the architects of state-level hate campaigns renders the electoral regulatory framework functionally impotent, effectively granting impunity to those who weaponize religion for political gain.54
Judicial Oversight and the Impunity Paradigm
The Indian judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, has repeatedly voiced severe concerns regarding the normalization of hate speech. The Court has issued stern warnings to the political class, emphasizing that constitutional power must be exercised with restraint and that leaders hold a continuous obligation to uphold constitutional values and foster fraternity.56 Petitions filed by civil servants, diplomats, and intellectuals have eloquently argued that when hate speech emanates from constitutional authorities, it acquires a coercive force that shapes administrative behavior and legitimizes discriminatory governance, even in the absence of explicit incitement to violence.24
However, the translation of judicial concern into systemic accountability is severely hampered by a sluggish legal system and a highly partisan law enforcement apparatus.57 Data from the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) illustrates the deep entrenchment of this issue: recent analyses reveal that 107 sitting Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MLAs) nationwide have declared criminal cases related to hate speech against themselves, and 480 candidates with such cases have contested elections in the last five years.58 This data demonstrates that deploying communal rhetoric is not merely unpunished; it is actively rewarded with electoral success.58 When police forces operate under the direct command of the very politicians orchestrating the hate campaigns, the invocation of hate speech laws—such as Section 153A (promoting enmity) or Section 295A (outraging religious feelings) of the Indian Penal Code—becomes highly selective. These laws are frequently weaponized to persecute dissenting journalists, academics, and civil rights activists, rather than prosecuting the actual purveyors of communal hate.54
Grassroots Defiance: Civil Society Resistance and Counter-Narratives
In the vast vacuum left by institutional failure and administrative complicity, civil society organizations, grassroots activists, and the marginalized communities themselves have emerged as the primary, and often solitary, bulwarks against the deluge of electoral hate speech. Despite operating in a climate of intense state surveillance and intimidation, these actors continuously strive to document abuses, seek legal recourse, and construct powerful cultural counter-narratives.61
Organizations such as Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP), the India Hate Lab, and the South Asia Justice Campaign have undertaken the critical, albeit highly dangerous, task of exhaustively monitoring, recording, and legally challenging hate speech events across the nation.7 By continuously filing First Information Reports (FIRs) and lodging formal, meticulously documented complaints with state electoral officers against high-profile politicians, these entities strive to create an indelible evidentiary archive of the state's descent into majoritarianism. While immediate legal victories may be scarce, this relentless documentation forces a degree of bureaucratic friction against unchecked impunity and provides crucial data for international human rights monitors.25
Simultaneously, an organic, profoundly resilient cultural resistance has galvanized within the targeted communities themselves. The "Miya Poetry" movement stands as a remarkable example of subaltern defiance in contemporary Assam.21 Emerging directly from the Bengali Muslim char-dwellers, this literary movement subversively reclaims the pejorative slur "Miya" to articulate the deep pain of historical marginalization, the terror of statelessness, and the visceral trauma inflicted by the NRC and CAA processes.21
Writing in their native, hyper-localized dialects, these poets directly challenge the state's dehumanizing narrative that portrays them as "environmental waste producers" and "parasites." Instead, they express what scholars term an "ecopolitical spirituality"—a deep, nurturing, and historical entanglement with the land, the riverine ecology of the Brahmaputra, and the flora and fauna of Assam.21 By humanizing their lived reality through art, the Miya poets construct a powerful counter-storytelling mechanism that fundamentally refuses the exclusionary, Hindutva-based territoriality of the state. They assert their rightful, dignified claim to citizenship, belonging, and humanity in a space that seeks their erasure.22
Furthermore, digital activism has carved out new spaces for civic expression in Assam, despite the severe risks of online harassment and doxing.62 Activists, including women and LGBTQ+ individuals, utilize digital platforms to build solidarity networks, raise awareness about state violence, and organize resistance against dominant caste and religious hierarchies.62 However, this digital resistance is constantly threatened by the "digital divide," which excludes rural populations, and the constant peril of state reprisal, where online dissent is frequently criminalized under the guise of maintaining public order.62
Conclusion
The mobilization of hate speech during elections in Assam is not an anomaly, a momentary lapse in political decorum, or a byproduct of passionate democratic campaigning. It is, unequivocally, a calculated, highly structured strategy engineered to consolidate political power by fundamentally fracturing the social contract. The transition from historical ethno-linguistic anxieties to a sharp, religiously motivated majoritarianism has been systematically facilitated by sweeping legislative gerrymandering—most notably the CAA—and the bureaucratic violence of the NRC. These mechanisms have collectively laid the impenetrable groundwork for the systemic othering, disenfranchisement, and persecution of Bengali-origin Muslims.
This comprehensive analysis underscores that the contemporary architecture of electoral hate relies on a lethal, symbiotic relationship between multiple actors. It requires political executives who are willing to normalize dehumanizing rhetoric and fabricate existential threats—ranging from "termites" to various "jihads"—to keep the majority in a state of perpetual panic. It requires an unregulated digital ecosystem where global social media corporations prioritize algorithmic engagement over human safety, exhibiting catastrophic failures in vernacular content moderation that allow genocidal ideation to flourish online. The advent of AI-weaponized disinformation and hyper-realistic deepfakes further accelerates this dangerous dynamic, completely bypassing rational political discourse to directly trigger visceral, communal panic among the electorate.
The consequences of this institutionalized strategy are dire and measurable in human lives and shattered communities. Rhetoric inevitably bleeds into reality, manifesting as brutal, militarized eviction drives, fatal police shootings, economic boycotts, and the looming, terrifying threat of mass statelessness and detention for millions of citizens. Concurrently, the total paralyzation of constitutional safeguards—evidenced by the Election Commission's profound reluctance to penalize top leadership and law enforcement's active complicity in weaponizing the law against minorities and dissidents—signals a severe and potentially irreversible crisis in India's democratic framework.
Addressing this escalating, existential crisis requires interventions that move far beyond mere observation and judicial reprimands. It demands the rigorous, impartial enforcement of existing electoral and penal laws against constitutional authorities, entirely free from political interference. The Election Commission must reclaim its independence and exercise its punitive powers decisively to deter hate speech at the highest executive levels. Furthermore, it necessitates urgent, binding, and internationally monitored regulatory frameworks for social media platforms to combat algorithmic amplification, enforce strict vernacular content moderation, and neutralize the threat of AI-generated deepfakes. Ultimately, restoring the democratic integrity and social harmony of Assam—and by extension, the broader Republic of India—depends entirely on dismantling the political utility of hate. Elections must revert to being contests of developmental policy, economic progress, and social welfare, rather than violent, exclusionary referendums on the survival, legitimacy, and fundamental human dignity of minority communities.
Works cited
The Architecture of Polarisation: A structural analysis of communal hate speech as a core electoral strategy in India (2024–2025) | CJP, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://cjp.org.in/the-architecture-of-polarisation-a-structural-analysis-of-communal-hate-speech-as-a-core-electoral-strategy-in-india-2024-2025/
Report 2024: Hate Speech Events in India, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.csohate.org/2025/02/10/hate-speech-report-india-2024/
'Stress on Hindu identity': BJP hate campaign in poll-bound Assam - Al Jazeera, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/25/stress-on-hindu-identity-bjp-hate-campaign-in-poll-bound-assam
Hindutva and the Muslim Question in Assam: Underlying Tensions and Emerging Dynamics - Social Change and Development, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://socialchangeanddevelopment.in/downloads/september2024/paper-3.pdf
Data Reveals Rising Hate and Violence Against Bengali-Origin Muslims in Assam, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.indiahatelab.com/2025/07/31/hate-campaign-in-assam/
Bengali Muslims of Assam: In Extreme Poverty and Yet Harassed | The India Forum, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.theindiaforum.in/politics/bengali-muslims-assam-extreme-poverty-and-yet-harassed
India Hate Speech Monitor - South Asia Justice Campaign, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://southasiajusticecampaign.org/hate-speech-monitor/
Assam and the “Illegal” Other (Chapter 3) - India's Bangladesh Problem, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/indias-bangladesh-problem/assam-and-the-illegal-other/6C8CE69DF56E4C79E64DED349B75028B
Assam Movement - Wikipedia, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assam_Movement
Full article: BORDERING ASSAM THROUGH AFFECTIVE CLOSURE: 1971 AND THE ROAD TO THE CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT OF 2019 - Taylor & Francis, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03068374.2022.2076477
NRC, “Jatiyotabaad” and Citizenship Crisis in Assam - OpenEdition Journals, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://journals.openedition.org/samaj/8530?lang=fr
Indian Muslims and the Anti-CAA Protests: From Marginalization Towards Exclusion, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://journals.openedition.org/samaj/6701
The crisis of citizenship in our time - PMC, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8190737/
Country Update: Increasing Abuses against Religious Minorities in India - USCIRF, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/2024%20India%20Country%20Update.pdf
A Reckoning For Religious Freedom: India's BJP and the International Implications of Anti-Muslim Leadership, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2115&context=auilr
As Bengali Muslims Flee Homes In Eastern Assam, The Chief Minister Ramps Up Familiar Islamophobic Rhetoric - Article 14, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://tribe.article-14.com/post/as-bengali-muslims-flee-homes-in-eastern-assam-the-chief-minister-ramps-up-familiar-islamophobic-rhetoric-66d6826028898
CJP Impact: NCM's prompt action against 'Miya Muslim' remark; seeks report from Assam DGP - Citizens for Justice and Peace, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://cjp.org.in/cjp-impact-ncms-prompt-action-against-miya-muslim-remark-seeks-report-from-assam-dgp/
Who Is a Citizen of India? Citizenship Amendment Act, Minorities, and Termites (Chapter 5), accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/weaponizing-language/who-is-a-citizen-of-india-citizenship-amendment-act-minorities-and-termites/8F2BB6733F7DCF4893ED029952641122
How will the geopolitics in Assam, shaped by religious mobilization, affect bilateral relations between India and Bangladesh? - Diva-portal.org, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1690341/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Facebook Used to Spread Hate Speech in Assam: New Report - TIME, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://time.com/5712366/facebook-hate-speech-violence/
The Ecopolitical Spirituality of Miya Poetry: Resistance Against Environmental Racism of the Majoritarian State in Assam, India - MDPI, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/4/437
From rhetorical “inclusion” toward decolonial futures: Building communities of resistance against structural violence, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://cectresourcelibrary.info/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Dutta-From-rhetorical-inclusion-toward-decolonial-futures-Building-communities-of.pdf
Communal Dog-Whistles in an Election Season: CJP flags hate speech by BJP's Ameet Satam to election authorities - Citizens for Justice and Peace, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://cjp.org.in/communal-dog-whistles-in-an-election-season-cjp-flags-hate-speech-by-bjps-ameet-satam-to-election-authorities/
Supreme Court asked to intervene as petitions flag “normalisation of hate” in Assam CM's public speeches | SabrangIndia, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://sabrangindia.in/supreme-court-asked-to-intervene-as-petitions-flag-normalisation-of-hate-in-assam-cms-public-speeches/
Assam CM Faces FIR for 'Miya' Hate Speech | Himanta Biswa Sarma | Tomato Price | Muslims | Guwahati - YouTube, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InUnJ-k82Qw
Complaints lodged against Assam CM for hate speech - The Hindu, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/complaints-lodged-against-assam-cm-for-hate-speech/article67090448.ece
INDIA bloc demands strict action from ECI against Assam CM for 'inflammatory and divisive speeches' - The Hindu, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.thehindu.com/elections/jharkhand-assembly/india-bloc-demands-strict-action-from-eci-against-assam-cm-for-inflammatory-and-divisive-speeches/article68825408.ece
NRC, CAA, and Muslim Minority in India: A Source of Potential Conflict in South Asia?, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373952964_NRC_CAA_and_Muslim_Minority_in_India_A_Source_of_Potential_Conflict_in_South_Asia
1 Social Media and Offline Hate Speech in India, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.csohate.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Report-Social-Media-and-Hate-Speech-in-India.pdf
India Hate Lab Report Final, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://indiahatelab.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/India-Hate-Lab-Report-Final-12.pdf
Hate Speech Events in India - Report 2023, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://indiahatelab.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Hate-Speech-Events-in-India%E2%80%94-Report-2023-.pdf
Social Media and Election Campaigns: An Analysis of the Usage of Twitter during the 2021 Assam Assembly Elections - ResearchGate, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368286237_Social_Media_and_Election_Campaigns_An_Analysis_of_the_Usage_of_Twitter_during_the_2021_Assam_Assembly_Elections
Experiences of Muslims in India on digital platforms with anti-Muslim hate: a culture-centered exploration - Frontiers, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/communication/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1205116/full
Social Media and Election Campaigns: An Analysis of the Usage of Twitter during the 2021 Assam Assembly Elections - International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://ijssrr.com/journal/article/download/857/747/
(PDF) " Regional Television and Democratic Discourse in Assam: The Cultural politics of Space and Representation " - Academia.edu, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.academia.edu/34619951/_Regional_Television_and_Democratic_Discourse_in_Assam_The_Cultural_politics_of_Space_and_Representation_
Assam TV channels live off conflict - The Hoot, accessed on April 1, 2026, http://asu.thehoot.org/media-watch/media-practice/assam-tv-channels-live-off-conflict-4156
Social media - BJP's tool for hate - Indian National Congress, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://inc.in/in-focus/social-media-bjp-s-tool-for-hate
Preliminary Monitoring Report – Assam Assembly Elections: Political Communication, Digital Propaganda and AI-Weaponised Disinformation - Diaspora in Action for Human Rights and Democracy, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://dahrd.org/report/preliminary-monitoring-report-assam-assembly-elections-political-communication-digital-propaganda-and-ai-weaponised-disinformation/
Assam BJP's AI video a manufactured dystopia, Congress files complaint, myths exposed, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://cjp.org.in/assam-bjps-ai-video-a-manufactured-dystopia-congress-files-complaint-myths-exposed/
Assam BJP Hate Ad Shreds Modi's 'Sabka Saath Sabka Vishwas' Slogan - YouTube, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrPivqocGI0
DAD0073 - Evidence on Democracy and Digital Technologies - Committees - UK Parliament, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/105778/html/
Eviction, State Violence & Hate - APCR, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://apcrindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Eviction-State-Violence-Hate-1.pdf
A voter list exercise under scrutiny: Assam's Special Revision of electoral rolls, allegations of targeted harassment and misuse of Form-7 | CJP - Citizens for Justice and Peace, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://cjp.org.in/a-voter-list-exercise-under-scrutiny-assams-special-revision-of-electoral-rolls-allegations-of-targeted-harassment-and-misuse-of-form-7/
Deletion of 'doubtful voters' from poll rolls based on BJP complaints: Assam CM Himanta, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/assam/assam-sir-roll-revision-voter-cm-himanta-bjp-election/article70619528.ece
The Election Commission's Disenfranchisement Chaos In West Bengal Masks A Larger Project. Ask Amit Shah | Article-14, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://article-14.com/post/the-election-commission-s-disenfranchisement-chaos-in-west-bengal-masks-a-larger-project-ask-amit-shah-69cb3ce05b91a
Report of The Panel of Independent, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://piieindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/PIIE_2026.pdf
Compendium of Instructions On Model Code of Conduct 2024 | CEO Odisha, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://ceoodisha.nic.in/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Compendium-of-Instructions-on-Model-Code-of-Conduct-2024.pdf
Press Note dated 15.03.2026 for AS, KL, WB, TN & PUDU-Final - CEO, Puducherry, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://ceopuducherry.py.gov.in/gepla2026/ECI_PressNote_15_03_2026.pdf
Tracking Hate: Monitoring hate speech in India's general elections - Platform for Peace and Humanity, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://peacehumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Tracking-Hate-Monitoring-hate-speech-in-Indias-general-elections.pdf
India: high-profile candidates banned from election trail over hate speech - The Guardian, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/15/indian-party-leaders-banned-from-election-trail-over-hate-speech
EC issues show-cause notice to Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma for “communal” speech, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://sabrangindia.in/ec-issues-show-cause-notice-to-assam-cm-himanta-biswa-sarma-for-communal-speech/
Assam CM issued show-cause notice by Election Commission of India | CJP, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://cjp.org.in/assam-cm-issued-show-cause-notice-by-election-commission-of-india/
Hate speech allegations on the campaign trail: CJP Files complaints with State EC against Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma's Jharkhand remarks - Citizens for Justice and Peace, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://cjp.org.in/hate-speech-allegations-on-the-campaign-trail-cjp-files-complaints-with-state-ec-against-assam-cm-himanta-biswa-sarmas-jharkhand-remarks/
India: Hate Speech Fueled Modi's Election Campaign - Human Rights Watch, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/08/14/india-hate-speech-fueled-modis-election-campaign
The performance of Indian states in electoral integrity, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/eip-blog/2017/1/2/the-performance-of-indian-states-in-electoral-integrity
Supreme Court Warns Politicians To Exercise Restraint Amid Hate Speech Row - YouTube, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuQe0ZyknN8
Surge In Hate Speech From India's Highest Echelons, As Checks & Balance Fail & Justice For Victims Slips Away | Article-14, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://article-14.com/post/surge-in-hate-speech-from-india-s-highest-echelons-as-checks-balance-fail-justice-for-victims-slips-away--67ce16e119141
Indian elected officials and hate speech: ADR Report - Association for Democratic Reforms, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://adrindia.org/content/indian-elected-officials-and-hate-speech-adr-report
107 MPs and MLAs have hate speech cases against them: ADR - The Hindu, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/107-mps-and-mlas-have-hate-speech-cases-against-them-adr/article67375293.ece
Exploring the Multifaceted Roles of Hate Speech | CJP - Citizens for Justice and Peace, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://cjp.org.in/exploring-the-multifaceted-roles-of-hate-speech/
Human rights in India - Amnesty International, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-asia/india/report-india/
SOCIAL MEDIA AND ACTIVISM IN ASSAM: CATALYZING CHANGE THROUGH DIGITAL PLATFORM - TIJER.org, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://tijer.org/tijer/papers/TIJER2508084.pdf
Hate Hatao | CJP - Citizens for Justice and Peace, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://cjp.org.in/hate-hatao/
India Hate Lab (IHL) - Combating Hate Speech, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://indiahatelab.com/
Geopoetics as contentious politics: strategic relevance of the Miya poetry movement against the NRC-CAA in Assam, India - IDEAS/RePEc, accessed on April 1, 2026, https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v46y2025i10p1190-1209.html
